<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Detailed Abstractions &#187; Vice President Joe Biden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://detailedabstractions.com/tag/vice-president-joe-biden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://detailedabstractions.com</link>
	<description>Pathologically Pro-Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>New Definition:  Successful Stimulus Program</title>
		<link>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/03/02/new-definition-successful-stimulus-program/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-definition-successful-stimulus-program</link>
		<comments>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/03/02/new-definition-successful-stimulus-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael S. Langston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President Joe Biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detailedabstractions.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With high levels of bipartisan anger, not only affecting elections, but affecting polls on the flagship legislation&#8230; er, I mean, the monstrous health care bill which no understands as well (here via WaPo): &#8230;A CNN poll last week found that only 25 percent of Americans want Congress to pass a health-care bill similar to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With high levels of <a title="Voter anger is bipartisan, poll shows" href="http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/02/25/copy/voter-anger-is-bipartisan-poll-shows.html?sid=101" target="_blank" class="broken_link">bipartisan</a> anger, not only affecting <a title="New poll finds voter anger drove results of Mass. election" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/22/AR2010012203167.html" target="_blank">elections</a>, but affecting polls on the flagship legislation&#8230; er, I mean, the monstrous health care bill which no understands as well (<a title="Good for Obama, bad for congressional Democrats" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/01/AR2010030101223.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" target="_blank">here</a> via WaPo):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;A CNN poll last week found that only 25 percent of Americans want Congress to pass a health-care bill similar to the one it has been working on for the past year, while 73 percent say Congress should either start from scratch or not pass health-care legislation at all (other polls show support for the bill in the low 40s). &#8230;</p>
<p>The White House is once again, on a media blitz to prove the administrations&#8217; efficacy and job one is selling the idea the simulus worked.  While they have seemed keen enough to not discuss actual housing or job numbers, but instead spend time on nebulous items such as &#8220;<a title="The Fear Based Stimulus That Wasn’t" href="http://detailedabstractions.com/2009/08/23/the-fear-based-stimulus-that-wasnt/" target="_blank">saved  jobs</a>&#8220;, they are nonetheless telling us with great frequency what the stimulus did for us.</p>
<p>Vice President Joe Biden (<a title="VP Biden: It’s Taking a While to Get U.S. Economy &quot;Out of  this Ditch&quot; but Recovery Act Is Working" href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/02/vp-biden-its-taking-a-while-to-get-us-economy-out-of-this-ditch-but-recovery-act-is-working.html" target="_blank">here</a> via ABC News):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Vice President Joe Biden said today that  it is &#8220;taking a while&#8221; for the nation’s economy to &#8220;get out of this  ditch&#8221; but credited the Obama Administration’s stimulus legislation,  enacted one year ago, for laying a foundation for long-term economic  growth. &#8230;</p>
<p>As well as President Obama himself (<a title="Obama hails stimulus effect, says more work  ahead" href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/02/obama-hails-stimulus-effect-says-more-work-ahead/1" target="_blank">here</a> via USA Today):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">President Obama credits the one-year-old  economic stimulus legislation with staving off a second depression &#8230;</p>
<p>The President even sent high level officials all over the  country to prove the stimulus worked.  In one case, they used  construction for residential housing to spotlight the great work the  stimulus package has done for Cincinnati (<a title="Obama stimulus tour touts Avondale housing" href="http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20100218/BIZ01/2180355/1001/BIZ/Obama+stimulus+tour+touts+Avondale+housing" target="_blank">here </a>via Cincinnati.com).</p>
<p><strong>With </strong>unemployment numbers continuing to rise (UE Rate for January 2010 10.6%)</p>
<p><a href="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/UEChart.png"><img title="UEChart" src="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/UEChart.png" alt="" width="160" height="101" /></a></p>
<p><strong>&amp; </strong>defaults on existing mortgages doing the same (<a title="Exclusive: Mortgage delinquencies rise after Q4  plateau" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62053E20100301">here</a> via Reuters):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;More than 8 percent  of homeowners were behind 30  days or more on their mortgage loans, up  4.4 percent from December 2009  and 21 percent from last January&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>&amp; </strong>just like the last media blitz the White House went on  to   prove the stimulus was working (<a title="The Fear  Based Stimulus That   Wasn’t" href="http://detailedabstractions.com/2009/08/23/the-fear-based-stimulus-that-wasnt/" target="_blank">here </a>via DA), they have spent approximately 34% of   the money they  claimed to need originally (<a title="Stimulus Spending    Hits $272 Billion—34 Percent of Total" href="http://www.propublica.org/ion/stimulus/item/stimulus-spending-hits-272-billion-34-percent-of-total-209" target="_blank">here</a> via ProPublica).  Combining the money spent   and tax cuts approved  listed on Recovery.gov they find:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;the  government has now moved at  least $272 billion into the  economy, or  34  percent of the total amount  approved by Congress last  February&#8230;.</p>
<p>So there you have it.  Successful stimulus program is now defined as a jobless, homeless, shaky recovery, for which the majority of the money requested has yet to have been spent.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/03/02/new-definition-successful-stimulus-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing Recovery?</title>
		<link>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/03/01/housing-recovery/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=housing-recovery</link>
		<comments>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/03/01/housing-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael S. Langston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detailedabstractions.com/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to many reports from recent &#8220;economist&#8221; we are on are way.  Starting with the &#8220;Sage&#8221; Warren Buffet (here via Calculated Risk) arguing that supply has dropped below demand, which effectively will balance out the system: &#8230;Our country has wisely selected the third option, which means that within a year or so residential housing problems [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to many reports from recent &#8220;economist&#8221; we are on are way.  Starting with the &#8220;Sage&#8221; Warren Buffet (<a title="Buffett on Housing" href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/02/buffett-on-housing.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CalculatedRisk+%28Calculated+Risk%29" target="_blank">here</a> via Calculated Risk) arguing that supply has dropped below demand, which effectively will balance out the system:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;Our country has wisely selected the third option, which means that  within a year or so residential housing problems should largely be  behind us&#8230;</p>
<p>The NY Times  (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/29/business/economy/29housing.html">here</a>):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">After a  plunge lasting three years, houses have finally become cheap  enough to  lure buyers. That, in turn, is stabilizing prices, generating  hope that  the real estate market is beginning to recover&#8230;.</p>
<p>&amp; Our <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">trusted</span> Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernake (<a title="Bernanke Expects Housing Recovery by Year End" href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/23131888/Bernanke_Expects_Housing_Recovery_by_Year_End" target="_blank">here</a> via CNBC):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told lawmakers Tuesday he expects the downtroddenU.S. housing sector to improve by the end of the year, a senator who participated in the closed-door meeting said&#8230;.</p>
<p>At first, this might seem like some sort of an agreement, however there is one stark difference.  Mr. Buffet spoke in February 2010, the NY Times piece is from July 2009, &amp; Mr. Bernake spoke in February 2008.</p>
<p>The timing of the statements is instructive, as each was based upon changes in supply and demand.  The problem all had in their given time frames appears to be the same &#8211; you simply can&#8217;t count on economic activity trending when the growth was due to temporary <em>incentives </em>from the federal government.</p>
<p>As with Cash-for-Clunkers (<a title="Political Accounting" href="http://detailedabstractions.com/2009/08/03/political-accounting/" target="_blank">here</a>), Cash-for-Appliances (<a title="Short Sighted Economic Thinking" href="http://detailedabstractions.com/2009/09/02/short-sighted-economic-thinking/" target="_blank">here</a>), and recent tax breaks and money for lending, Cash-for-Homes will fail as well.  A temporary relief program will only provide temporary relief and is already showing signs of weakness.  From WaPo (<a title="Housing recovery could take a decade, economists warn" href="http://http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/26/AR2010012604115.html" target="_blank" class="broken_link">here</a>):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;Even as the housing market shows signs of improvement, including in new data released Tuesday, economists warn that it could take up to a decade for many homeowners to regain equity in their homes, while some people in the hardest-hit regions of the country may not see a recovery during their lifetime. &#8230;</p>
<p>CNBC (<a title="Housing Recovery Is Looking A Lot Shakier Than Expected" href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/35589633" target="_blank">here</a>):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The recent slump in housing is making some analysts uneasy about a  recovery that many thought sustainable just a couple months ago and  comes at a time when the Federal Reserve is nearing the end of a  critical, year-long program to support the mortgage market&#8230;.</p>
<p>&amp; Time (<a title="Housing Recovery Stalls" href="http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/2010/02/26/on-the-stalled-housing-recovery/" target="_blank">here</a>):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">For a while there, it seemed the housing market had made the turn to  recovery. Housing sales were up in nearly every month in 2009. But today  it looks like real estate is headed back down again&#8230;</p>
<p>Delaying the inevitable will just make the pain worse.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/03/01/housing-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 3880/3910 objects using disk: basic

Served from: detailedabstractions.com @ 2012-02-08 18:34:59 -->
