<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Detailed Abstractions &#187; e!Science News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://detailedabstractions.com/tag/escience-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://detailedabstractions.com</link>
	<description>Pathologically Pro-Freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Infinite Monkey Theorems</title>
		<link>http://detailedabstractions.com/2011/01/20/infinite-monkey-theorems-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=infinite-monkey-theorems-2</link>
		<comments>http://detailedabstractions.com/2011/01/20/infinite-monkey-theorems-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael S. Langston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e!Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infinite Monkey Theorems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Naval Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detailedabstractions.com/?p=1972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things worth... something :: New AL Governor religious bigot :: Obamacare set to insure 39M, now supposedly impacts 129M :: Wired's false headline :: Science news on cool lazers and astronomical art ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_1980" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 190px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1980 " title="Infinite Monkey Theorems" src="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/monkey_typewriter-300x192.jpg" alt="Monkey @ Typewritter - doing better than most journalists" width="180" height="115" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Infinite Monkey Theorems</dd>
</dl>
<p>  </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Headlines</strong> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Worth Reading </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>&#8230;.or at least pondering and forgetting&#8230;..</em> </p>
<p><strong> </strong>  </p>
<p><strong>From the First Amendment Center</strong>, the new Alabama governor displays amazing religious intolerance and arrogance.  I thought this was 2011&#8230;.. (whole thing <a title="New Ala. governor: Only Christians are his brothers, sisters " href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=23806" target="_blank" class="broken_link">here</a>): </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley told a church crowd just moments into his new administration that those who have not accepted Jesus as their savior are not his brothers and sisters, shocking some critics who questioned yesterday whether he could be fair to non-Christians. </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">“Anybody here today who has not accepted Jesus Christ as their savior, I’m telling you, you’re not my brother and you’re not my sister, and I want to be your brother,” Bentley said Jan. 17, his inauguration day, according to <em>The Birmingham News.</em> </p>
<p><strong>From the Obama Administration</strong>: Remember Obamacare?  Which was going to add 39 million previously uninsured people to the status of insured (<a title="Preliminary Analysis of Major Provisions Related to Health Insurance Coverage Under the Affordable Health Choices Act" href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=293" target="_blank">here</a> via CBO)?  </p>
<p>Well, here we are in 2011 &#8211; a time when Obamacare is <em>*not* </em>implemented and the provisions that have gone into effect only went into affect on January 1, 2011. </p>
<p>Apparently that&#8217;s a very long time though&#8230;.. as according to the WhiteHouse via the Department of Health and Human Services, repealing Obamacare will put 129 million insured at risk (<a title="At Risk: Pre-Existing Conditions Could Affect 1 in 2 Americans:" href="http://www.healthcare.gov/center/reports/preexisting.html" target="_blank">here</a> via HealthCare.gov). </p>
<p><em>Seriously?</em>  I wonder if DHHS is still accepting information on those (<a title="Healthcare &amp; Government Threats" href="http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/09/13/healthcare-government-threats/" target="_blank">here</a> via DA) dealing in misinformation with regards to Obamacare? </p>
<p><strong>From Wired</strong>, a meaningless, and based upon presented evidence, a false headline [emphasis added] <a title="Supreme Court Upholds Intrusive Government Background Checks" href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/scotus-background-checks/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+wired/politics+(Wired:+Politics)" target="_blank"><em>Supreme Court Upholds Intrusive Government Background Checks</em></a><em>.  </em> </p>
<p>The actual article?  </p>
<p>The Supreme Court ruled that private contractors working for the government cannot be shielded from background investigations based upon a right to privacy.  That government contractors can in fact, by virtue that they are basically government employees, be treated just as any other federal employee. </p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but subjecting yourself to a background check that resembles the exact same background check of others you work with doesn&#8217;t seem to be intrusive.  </p>
<p>Which is irregardless for Wired anyway, as even <strong><em>*if*</em> </strong>this decision could be argued logically as intrusion, the article doesn&#8217;t even attempt to offer proof of such an assertion. </p>
<p><strong>From eScience News</strong>, US Office of Naval Research announces big news on the &#8220;<em>Cool Things That Kill&#8221;</em> front (<a title="US Office of Naval Research achieves milestone" href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2011/01/19/us.office.naval.research.achieves.milestone" target="_blank">here</a>): </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Scientists at Los Alamos National Lab, N.M., have achieved a remarkable breakthrough with the Office of Naval Research&#8217;s Free Electron Laser (FEL) program, demonstrating an injector capable of producing the electrons needed to generate megawatt-class laser beams for the Navy&#8217;s next-generation weapon system. </p>
<div id="attachment_1977" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 168px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1977 " title="PHALANX WITH LASER CANNON: An artist's rendering of a weapon featuring a laser cannon and Gatling gun side by side on a naval vessel, with the laser shooting down a UAV." src="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/laser-downs-uavs_1.jpg" alt="PHALANX WITH LASER CANNON: An artist's rendering of a weapon featuring a laser cannon and Gatling gun side by side on a naval vessel, with the laser shooting down a UAV." width="158" height="158" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Artist&#39;s Rendering &quot;PHALANX WITH LASER CANNON&quot; Source: Raytheon</p></div>
<p>To put a little context into what megawatt means (1,000 kilowatts), Scientific American reports in July 2010 (<a title="U.S. Navy Laser Weapon Shoots Down Drones in Test [Video]" href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=laser-downs-uavs" target="_blank">here</a>): </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In a grainy, black-and-white video that looks like a home movie of a UFO attack a sleek aircraft streaks through the sky one minute, only to burst into flames the next and plummet into the sea&#8230;. </p>
<p>Using a 32-kilowatt laser (article cont&#8217;d): </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The defense contractor says it depicts part of a test conducted in May during which the U.S. Navy used a solid-state laser to shoot down unmanned aerial vehicles over the Pacific Ocean&#8230;. </p>
<p>&amp; Lastly &#8211; <strong>ESO&#8217;s Hidden Treasure Contest</strong> reveals winner (<a title="s Hidden Treasures Brought to Light" href="http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1102/" target="_blank">here</a>): </p>
<div id="attachment_1974" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 190px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1974 " title="M78 for ESO Processing contest. WFI camera on 2.2m telescope" src="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/M78WFI_R5x3min_G3x3min_B3x3min_size501-300x291.jpg" alt="M78 for ESO Processing contest. WFI camera on 2.2m telescope" width="180" height="175" /><p class="wp-caption-text">M78 for ESO Processing contest. WFI camera on 2.2m telescope</p></div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">  </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Hidden Treasures gave amateur astronomers the opportunity to search ESO’s vast archives of astronomical data for a well-hidden cosmic gem. Astronomy enthusiast Igor Chekalin from Russia won the first prize in this difficult but rewarding challenge&#8230;. </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">  </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">  </p>
<p>More amazing astronomical artwork here: <a title="Top 100 From ESO" href="http://www.eso.org/public/images/archive/top100/" target="_blank">Top 100 from ESO</a></p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://detailedabstractions.com/2011/01/20/infinite-monkey-theorems-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infinite Monkey Theorems 20100427</title>
		<link>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/04/27/infinite-monkey-theorems-20100427/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=infinite-monkey-theorems-20100427</link>
		<comments>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/04/27/infinite-monkey-theorems-20100427/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael S. Langston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People/Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e!Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infinite Monkey Theorems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reason.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://detailedabstractions.com/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th Circuit strikes again&#8230;. via LA Times (here): SAN FRANCISCO — A sharply divided federal appeals court in California on Monday exposed Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to billions of dollars in legal damages when it ruled a massive class action lawsuit alleging gender discrimination over pay for female workers can go to trial&#8230;. Now I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/lady-justice.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-945 alignright" style="margin-left: 3px;" title="lady justice" src="http://detailedabstractions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/lady-justice-190x300.jpg" alt="" width="130" height="210" /></a>The 9th </strong>Circuit strikes again&#8230;. via LA Times (<a title="Court: Wal-Mart to face massive class action suit" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-walmart-20100427,0,3396163.story" target="_blank" class="broken_link">here</a>):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">SAN FRANCISCO — A sharply divided federal appeals court in California on  Monday exposed Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to billions of dollars in legal  damages when it ruled a massive class action lawsuit alleging gender  discrimination over pay for female workers can go to trial&#8230;.</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t claim to be a lawyer and haven&#8217;t even played one on tv, but part of the dissent seems obvious to me:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote a blistering dissent, joined by four of her  colleagues.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;No court has ever certified a class like this one, until now. And with  good reason,&#8221; Ikuta wrote. &#8220;In this case, six women who have worked in  thirteen of Wal-Mart&#8217;s 3,400 stores seek to represent every woman who  has worked in those stores over the course of the last decade — a class  estimated in 2001 to include more than 1.5 million women.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe they like being overturned (<a title="Disorder in the court" href="http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jul/11/opinion/oe-fitzpatrick11" target="_blank">here</a> from 2007)?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;The 9th Circuit also has a long-running streak as the most overturned,  which went unbroken this year. The Supreme Court reviewed 22 cases from  the 9th Circuit last term, and it reversed or vacated 19 times&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>Via</strong> WSJ, <a title="The Big Brown Union Bailout " href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748704133804575198232906957778-lMyQjAxMTAwMDIwNzEyNDcyWj.html" target="_blank"><em>The Big Brown Union Bailout</em></a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">If you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em, have Congress hobble &#8216;em. That&#8217;s the motto of some in corporate America, and Exhibit A might be United Parcel Service&#8217;s campaign to get Washington to impose its labor woes on rival Federal Express. This would be one more union bailout at the expense of business competition and economic efficiency&#8230;.</p>
<p>This is a continuation of this administration&#8217;s policies to pay off unions at the expense of others (DA posts <a href="http://detailedabstractions.com/?s=unions&amp;x=0&amp;y=0">here</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Via </strong>Reason.com, <a title="GM's Phony Bailout Payback" href="http://reason.com/archives/2010/04/27/gms-phony-bailout-payback?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FArticles+%28Reason+Online+-+All+Articles+%28except+Hit+%26+Run+blog%29%29" target="_blank"><em>GM&#8217;s Phony Bailout Payback</em></a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Uncle Sam gave GM <a href="http://www.carlist.com/blog/?p=1374" class="broken_link">$49.5  billion</a> last summer in aid to finance its bankruptcy&#8230;.  So when Whitacre publishes a column with the headline, &#8220;The GM Bailout: Paid Back in Full,&#8221; most ordinary mortals unfamiliar with bailout minutia would assume that he is alluding to the entire $49.5 billion. That, however, is far from the case&#8230;.</p>
<p>I say if you want to buy American, buy Ford &#8211; no bailout money and still going strong.</p>
<p><strong>&amp; cool science </strong>news via e!Science (<a title="Physicists capture first images of atomic spin" href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/04/26/physicists.capture.first.images.atomic.spin?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+eScienceNews%2Fpopular+%28e!+Science+News+-+Popular%29" target="_blank">here</a>):</p>
<p>&#8230;<a href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/04/26/physicists.capture.first.images.atomic.spin?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+eScienceNews%2Fpopular+%28e!+Science+News+-+Popular%29"><img class="alignleft" style="margin-left: 4px; margin-right: 4px;" src="http://esciencenews.com/files/images/201004262985990.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="80" /></a>In a study published as an Advance Online Publication in the journal <em>Nature  Nanotechnology</em> on Sunday, physicists at Ohio University and the  University of Hamburg in Germany present the first images of spin in  action&#8230;.</p>
     ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://detailedabstractions.com/2010/04/27/infinite-monkey-theorems-20100427/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 3062/3064 objects using disk: basic

Served from: detailedabstractions.com @ 2012-05-22 17:59:09 -->
