Detailed Abstractions

I have long been of the belief that our President is not stupid.  He’s always seemed very smart, especially with respect to Constitutional law.

For instance, in 2001, he stated correctly, that the Constitution is a charter which guarantees negative liberties.  For some this might seem obvious, but I doubt most of our current politicians understand what he meant and what is meant by the statement itself.

Now Mr. Obama’s policies belie the notion that he agrees the Constitution should be a defender of only negative liberties, but I think it was an instructive quote on his understanding of the fundamental principles which made America what it is.

Irregardless, over the time of his presidency, I’ve seen more clues to insecurity and lack of basic focus through the administration’s constant attempts to attack various news outlets and pundits directly, as well as the President’s comments without teleprompters.

& Last week was little exception.  @ Newsweek Blogs, Mr. Obama, when being asked about the new SCOTUS nominee stated (here):

“I don’t have litmus tests around any of these issues, but I will say that I want somebody who is going to be interpreting our Constitution in a way that takes into account individual rights, and that includes women’s rights, and that is going to be something that is very important to me.”

With all due respect to the President and anyone who agrees with this statement, but logically individual rights are mutually exclusive to “women’s” rights.

By definition, an individual right would be one that can be held and exercised by any individual, whereas any collective right, such as women’s rights, is the exact opposite; a right held by that group.

Maybe this is overly pedantic, but words have meanings & regardless of what “ism” might or might not be practiced by this administration, collectivist thought is the enemy as it serves as the basis for most of the world’s failed political philosophies.

As Calvin Coolidge stated:

“Liberty  is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty.”

Take a dash of holy water here, sprinkle a little public policy there and voila!  Socialism.

Through the Vatican pulpit, the Pope is now giving out political advice based on Marx’s idea of collectivism.  In a letter from the Pope (here), it begins with:

Charity in truth, to which Jesus Christ bore witness by his earthly life and especially by his death and resurrection, is the principal driving force behind the authentic development of every person and of all humanity.

Finally gets to this:

From the social point of view, systems of protection and welfare, already present in many countries in Paul VI’s day, are finding it hard and could find it even harder in the future to pursue their goals of true social justice in today’s profoundly changed environment. The global market has stimulated first and foremost, on the part of rich countries, a search for areas in which to outsource production at low cost with a view to reducing the prices of many goods, increasing purchasing power and thus accelerating the rate of development in terms of greater availability of consumer goods for the domestic market. Consequently, the market has prompted new forms of competition between States as they seek to attract foreign businesses to set up production centres, by means of a variety of instruments, including favourable fiscal regimes and deregulation of the labour market. These processes have led to a downsizing of social security systems as the price to be paid for seeking greater competitive advantage in the global market, with consequent grave danger for the rights of workers, for fundamental human rights and for the solidarity associated with the traditional forms of the social State. Systems of social security can lose the capacity to carry out their task, both in emerging countries and in those that were among the earliest to develop, as well as in poor countries. Here budgetary policies, with cuts in social spending often made under pressure from international financial institutions, can leave citizens powerless in the face of old and new risks; such powerlessness is increased by the lack of effective protection on the part of workers’ associations. Through the combination of social and economic change, trade union organizations experience greater difficulty in carrying out their task of representing the interests of workers, partly because Governments, for reasons of economic utility, often limit the freedom or the negotiating capacity of labour unions.

So in the fine tradition of charities everywhere, the Pope seems to believe it to incumbent on governments to promote social spending, at the expense of others of course, and work towards ensuring workers’ unions.  I realize he wasn’t directly discussing the US, but the unions are part of the reason GM went under, therefore part of the reason there is less money to spend on social programs and more need for them in Detroit.

The Democrats of course believe the Pope’s pleas of economic justice falls directly in line with President Obama’s policies (here):

…The Pope “has provided a road map for how we can move ahead to accomplish economic justice,” said Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut. She is a Catholic member of the House Democratic leadership who has a 100 percent rating from the Washington-based Americans for Democratic Action, which describes itself as the “nation’s oldest independent liberal political organization.”

DeLauro and Representative Jim McGovern of Massachusetts yesterday opened a campaign of Catholic Democrats called “Pope Greets Hope” to draw a link between Church doctrine and Obama’s policy agenda. Obama will discuss the pontiff’s economic message with the Pope today, said White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs…

It’s not really a large shock that the Catholic Church’s very teachings, lean towards, or even completely agree, with the philosophy that is socialism, I think the news here is having Democrats openly agree with socialistic policies without even a hint that their country doesn’t want any part of it.

Here, here, & here -  Americans do not want more spending or larger government, but when your ideas are righteous and going only to promote the new utopia, little things like citizens’ opinions, many failed attempts for this perfection in history, facts, or really anything else.

As much as liberals like the chastise the religious right as being too dogmatic and anti-science, they surely do believe in the miracle of policies that have been shown to fail time and time again.